Summary As proposed in the Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA), Member States must embed specific, actionable plans within their national cloud and AI strategies to achieve a target where at least 25% of procurement for cloud computing services and AI systems is awarded to innovative small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This obligation, explicitly set out in Article 33(4), creates a mandatory feedback loop with the broader national strategy requirements in Article 7. Member States are required to actively monitor and report on their procurement of innovation annually; this data must directly feed into the strategic plans to identify barriers, improve access, and demonstrate progress toward the 25% objective.

Detail

The proposed Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA) represents a shift from purely supply-side capacity building to a comprehensive "ecosystem approach" that leverages public demand to drive innovation. A critical component of this approach is the use of public procurement to reduce dependencies on non-European providers and foster a competitive market for European SMEs. The regulation establishes a rigorous framework where high-level national strategies are inextricably linked to granular procurement monitoring and reporting.

The National Strategy Mandate (Article 7)

Under Article 7 of the proposed regulation, Member States are required to establish national cloud and AI strategies within one year of the regulation's entry into force. These strategies are not merely policy statements; they are legal instruments that must be consistent with CADA's objectives and contribute to the digital targets of the Digital Decade Policy Programme.

Article 7(2) defines the minimum content of these strategies. Crucially, point (f) mandates that strategies must include "measures to support the development of cloud and AI capabilities and promote excellence and innovation, including through public procurement measures, and public procurement of innovation measures set out in Article 33." This provision creates a direct legislative bridge between the strategic planning phase and the operational execution of procurement rules. It ensures that the ambition to foster innovation is not left to chance but is codified in national planning documents.

The Monitoring and Reporting Engine (Article 33)

Article 33 serves as the operational engine that drives the strategic goals. It establishes a continuous cycle of monitoring, reporting, and adaptation specifically for the procurement of innovation in cloud computing services and AI systems.

  • Active Monitoring: Article 33(1) imposes a duty on Member States to monitor and report on their use of procurement of innovation. This is not a passive observation but an active requirement to track how public money is being spent on innovative solutions.
  • Barrier Identification: Article 33(2) mandates that this monitoring data must be actively used to identify barriers to SME participation. The regulation explicitly requires Member States to take measures to improve SME access, support the design of "simplified, proportionate and SME-friendly procurement strategies," and promote the division of contracts into lots. This ensures that the data collected leads to tangible procedural changes.
  • Annual Reporting: Article 33(3) requires Member States to inform the Commission annually on specific metrics:
    • The size of economic operators participating in such procurement.
    • SME participation trends, including the number of contracts awarded to SMEs, their share of the total contract value, and the share of cross-border SME participation where available.
    • The specific measures taken to improve SME access to public procurement procedures.

The 25% Objective and Strategic Planning (Article 33(4))

The cornerstone of the demand-side strategy is the quantitative objective found in Article 33(4). Member States must "pursue as an objective that at least 25% of their procurement for cloud computing services and AI systems be awarded to innovative SMEs."

However, the regulation goes beyond setting a target; it demands a plan to achieve it. Article 33(4) explicitly states: "Member States shall include, in their national strategies referred to in Article 7, plans on how they intend to achieve this objective."

This creates a closed, self-correcting loop:

  1. Strategic Planning: The national cloud and AI strategy (Article 7) must contain concrete, documented plans to reach the 25% innovative SME target.
  2. Execution & Simplification: Procurement authorities implement measures to remove barriers, such as dividing contracts into lots and simplifying procedures (Article 33(2)).
  3. Data Collection: Data on SME participation, contract values, and barriers is collected and reported annually to the Commission (Article 33(3)).
  4. Feedback & Adaptation: This monitoring data informs the ongoing refinement of the plans within the national strategy, ensuring that the 25% objective is pursued with evidence-based adjustments.

Supporting Measures for Market Engagement

To facilitate this transition, Article 33(5) obliges Union entities and contracting authorities to promote specific practices that lower the entry threshold for smaller players. These include:

  • Conducting preliminary market consultations to understand market capabilities before launching tenders.
  • Facilitating matchmaking between public buyers and innovative solutions provided by European SMEs and start-ups.
  • Developing public contract clauses that are favourable for innovative SMEs.

These measures address the "imperfect information" market failure identified in the CADA explanatory memorandum, where public buyers often lack the expertise to engage with smaller, innovative providers compared to established large-scale providers.

What this means for you

For public-sector procurement officers, national digital strategy coordinators, and SMEs seeking public contracts, CADA introduces a structured, measurable, and legally binding framework for innovation procurement.

1. Strategic Alignment is Mandatory You cannot treat innovation procurement as an isolated tactical activity. Your national cloud and AI strategy must explicitly document the roadmap to achieving the 25% innovative SME award rate. If your current strategy lacks this specific plan, it must be updated to comply with Article 33(4) and Article 7. The strategy is the vehicle through which the target is pursued.

2. Data Collection is Critical Article 33 requires annual reporting to the Commission. You must establish robust internal tracking mechanisms to capture:

  • The legal size of bidders (SME vs. Large Enterprise) based on the standard EU definition.
  • The value of contracts awarded specifically to innovative SMEs.
  • Specific barriers encountered during procurement processes (e.g., overly complex tender documents, high compliance costs). Without this data, you cannot fulfill the reporting obligation, nor can you prove that your national strategy is effective.

3. Simplification is a Legal Imperative The regulation explicitly mentions supporting "simplified, proportionate and SME-friendly procurement strategies, including division into lots." Procurement officers should review existing tender templates to ensure they are not inadvertently excluding SMEs through disproportionate administrative burdens. Consider using lotting strategies to make cloud and AI contracts accessible to smaller vendors, as this is a key mechanism to achieve the 25% target.

4. Active Market Engagement Article 33(5) encourages preliminary market consultations and matchmaking. Procurement teams should proactively engage with European SMEs and start-ups before launching tenders. This helps tailor requirements to market capabilities and increases the likelihood of receiving competitive bids from innovative local providers, directly supporting the strategic objective.

5. Reporting Deadlines Be prepared to submit annual reports to the Commission. The data you provide will not only satisfy regulatory compliance but will also serve as the evidence base for updating your national strategy every three years, as required by Article 7(5).

Common misconceptions

Misconception 1: The 25% target is a hard quota for every tender. Correction: Article 33(4) states that Member States shall "pursue as an objective" that at least 25% of procurement be awarded to innovative SMEs. It is a strategic target for the Member State's overall procurement activity in cloud and AI, not a mandatory quota for every individual contract. However, the requirement to include "plans on how they intend to achieve this objective" in the national strategy means you must demonstrate active effort and measurable progress toward this aggregate goal.

Misconception 2: "Innovative SME" has a strict, narrow definition. Correction: CADA relies on the standard EU definition of SMEs (Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC). "Innovative" in this context refers to the procurement of innovation procedures and pre-commercial procurement of cloud and AI systems. It encourages procuring solutions that are novel or significantly improved, not just off-the-shelf commodity services. The focus is on the type of procurement (innovation-focused) and the beneficiary (SME).

Misconception 3: National strategies are one-off documents. Correction: Article 7(5) requires Member States to assess their national strategies at least every three years and update them where necessary. Furthermore, the annual reporting under Article 33 feeds directly into these updates. The strategy is a living document that must evolve based on the monitoring data of procurement outcomes and SME participation trends.

Misconception 4: This only applies to large, complex AI projects. Correction: Article 33 applies to the procurement of innovation in cloud computing services and AI systems. This includes a wide range of digital services. The emphasis on "division into lots" suggests that even smaller, modular cloud services should be considered for SME participation, rather than reserving innovation procurement only for massive, multi-year frameworks.

Official sources

Related

This is general information about a draft EU regulation, not legal advice.